IoT Security
Addressed Issues in 2025
Table of Contents
Expand All
|
Collapse All
IoT Security Docs
-
-
- Firewall Deployment Options for IoT Security
- Use a Tap Interface for DHCP Visibility
- Use a Virtual Wire Interface for DHCP Visibility
- Use SNMP Network Discovery to Learn about Devices from Switches
- Use Network Discovery Polling to Discover Devices
- Use ERSPAN to Send Mirrored Traffic through GRE Tunnels
- Use DHCP Server Logs to Increase Device Visibility
- Control Allowed Traffic for Onboarding Devices
- Support Isolated Network Segments
-
Addressed Issues in 2025
Review the addressed issues in IoT Security in 2025.
Where Can I Use This? | What Do I Need? |
---|---|
|
|
Review the addressed issues in IoT Security.
IoT Security Addressed Issues in February 2025
Issue ID | Description |
---|---|
DIT-51005 |
The Vulnerabilities of Interest widget did not display any
vulnerabilities.
|
DIT-50684 |
Some accounts with the Owner role were unable to activate email
notifications.
|
DIT-50444 |
Manually selecting a category or profile name identical to the
previous category or profile causes the assignment to fail.
|
DIT-50314 |
When searching for VLANs in the Asset Inventory query, the
drop-down displayed duplicate VLANs.
|
DIT-50255 |
Changing the time range on the Vulnerabilities section of the
Device Details page caused the page to display random CVE data.
|
DIT-50167 |
Device Attribute Polling failed when configuring the
All option.
|
IoT Security Addressed Issues in January 2025
Issue ID | Description |
---|---|
DIT-49130 |
Remote devices raised alerts when the client device was a
scanner.
|
DIT-49104 |
Site-based access control did not correctly interpret read-only
user roles.
|
DIT-48149 |
Some alerts in the Alerts table displayed the same host for
both the Source IP and Destination IP field.
|
DIT-48130 |
When a gateway’s information updated, it would also update the
Last Activity time stamp of old devices, even if they were no
longer connected to the network.
|
DIT-48335 |
The IoT Security portal web interface sometimes displayed
gray padding instead of scaling correctly when viewed on a
Firefox browser.
|